Home Articles Heart Rhythms
Pulseless Electrical Activity (PEA)

Pulseless Electrical Activity (PEA)

pulseless electrical activity

Approximately 300,000 out-of-hospital cardiac arrests (OHCA) occur annually in the United States, with survival around 8%.10 The initial rhythm may be ventricular fibrillation (VF), pulseless ventricular tachycardia (VT), asystole, or pulseless electrical activity (PEA).16 Two-thirds of OHCA have an initial non-shockable rhythm of PEA or asystole with an increasing incidence compared with initial shockable rhythms (ventricular fibrillation and pulseless ventricular tachycardia).1,19

Several studies have shown the incidence of PEA in-hospital to be approximately 35% to 40% of arrest events.20,15 For out-of-hospital cardiac arrest, the incidence of PEA is 22% to 30%.5,6 PEA arrests are associated with a poor prognosis, with a survival to discharge rate between 2% and 5% for out-of-hospital cardiac arrest.17,3 In addition, pulseless electrical activity after countershock is correlated with a worse prognosis than PEA presenting as the initial rhythm, with 0% to 2% of patients in post-countershock PEA surviving to discharge.13 Furthermore, post-countershock PEA with a slow and wide complex rhythm is associated with a worsened prognosis compared to the rapid, narrow complex PEA.11

PEA, formerly known as electromechanical dissociation, occurs in patients who have organized cardiac electrical activity without a palpable pulse.11 The absence of mechanical contractions is produced by factors that deplete myocyte high-energy phosphate stores and inhibit myocardial fiber shortening, including hypoxia, ischemia, metabolic acidosis, and ionic perturbations (particularly potassium and calcium changes).14 All cardiac arrest rhythms—that is, pulseless rhythms—that fall outside the category of pulseless ventricular tachycardia, ventricular fibrillation, or asystole are considered pulseless electrical activity.11

Various causes of PEA include significant hypoxia, profound acidosis, severe hypovolemia, tension pneumothorax, electrolyte imbalance, drug overdose, sepsis, large myocardial infarction, massive pulmonary embolism, cardiac tamponade, hypoglycemia, hypothermia, and trauma.21 The 2010 American Heart Association Guidelines for Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation and Emergency Cardiovascular Care list the “5 Hs and 5 Ts” that should be evaluated and treated when attempting to diagnose the cause(s) of PEA. They are hypoxia, hypovolemia, hypothermia, hyper/hypokalemia, hydrogen ion (acidosis), tension pneumothorax, tamponade (cardiac), toxins, and thrombosis (cardiac/pulmonary). Often, a standardized treatment algorithm is deployed that is the same for each patient in PEA regardless of the etiology, particularly in the prehospital setting, due to the time critical nature of the disease and lack of a clear identifiable etiology during resuscitation12. Characteristics of the PEA arrest rhythm may help with determining who would benefit from aggressive postcardiac care interventions such as therapeutic hypothermia.2,8,18,9

Even though most providers define PEA as an electrical rhythm with absent mechanical activity, Mehta further delineated PEA into pseudo-PEA and true PEA. Pseudo-PEA is a profound state of cardiogenic shock that is inadequate to maintain perfusion pressure (and thus a nondetectable pulse).11 Pseudo-PEA has the presence of aortic pulse pressures with a perfusion pressure less than 60 mm Hg.14 In pseudo-PEA, cardiac electrical activity is present with myocardial contractions that are not adequate to produce a palpable pulse.11 Pseudo-PEA is a form of severe shock in which diminished coronary perfusion leads to decreased myocardial function, thus further propagating hypotension.14 The pathologic insult causing the pseudo-PEA impedes the cardiovascular system’s ability to provide circulation throughout the body.11 In the spectrum of PEA etiologies, pseudo-PEA is frequently caused by hypovolemia, tachydysrhythmias, decreased cardiac contractility, or obstructions to circulation, such as pulmonary embolism, tamponade, and tension pneumothorax.4 Pseudo-PEA rhythms are often narrow QRS complex tachycardias.11

True PEA represents a more severe pathophysiology in which there is a complete absence of mechanical contractions—a true uncoupling of cardiac mechanical activity from the cardiac rhythm.11 Unlike the reduced aortic pressures of pseudo-PEA, true PEA is characterized by the absence of any aortic pulse pressures.11 True PED are characterized by profoundly slow rhythms with wide QRS complexes.11 The electrical component is characterized by an abnormal automaticity, usually seen at a slow ventricular rate with a wide QRS complex (QRS >0.12 seconds).11 Etiologies frequently associated with true PEA include large myocardial infarction, multiorgan failure, profound metabolic imbalances such as hyperkalemia, drug overdoses, hypothermia, acidosis, and prolonged cardiac arrest.11

PEA is a disease process with multiple etiologies, and effective treatment likely includes reversing the cause of cardiac arrest.7 Understanding the potential causes and treatments for the causes of PEA will enable providers to give the best possible care in a situation that statistically does not have positive outcomes.


References

  1. Abrams HC, McNally B, Ong M, Moyer PH, Dyer KS. A composite model of survival from out of hospital cardiac arrest using the Cardiac Arrest Registry to Enhance Survival (CARES). Resuscitation. 2013;84(8):1093–8.
  2. Arrich J, Holzer M, Havel C, Mullner M, Herkner H. Hypothermia for neuroprotection in adults after cardiopulmonary resuscitation. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2012;9: CD004128.
  3. Cooper S, Janghorbani M, Cooper G. A decade of in-hospital resuscitation: outcomes and prediction of survival. Resuscitation. 2006;68:231-7.
  4. Desbiens NA. Simplifying the diagnosis and management of pulseless electrical activity in adults: a qualitative review. Crit Care Med. 2008;36:391-6.
  5. Engdahl J, Bang A, Lindqvist J, Herlitz J. Factors affecting short and long-term prognosis among 1069 patients with out-of-hospital cardiac arrest and pulseless electrical activity. Resuscitation. 2001;51:17-25.
  6. Hallstrom A, Rea TD, Sayre MR, et al. Manual chest compression vs use of an automated chest compression device during resuscitation following out-of-hospital cardiac arrest: a randomized trial. JAMA. 2006;295:2620-8.
  7. Hauck, M., Studnek, J., Heffner, A.C., & Pearson, D.A. (2015). Cardiac arrestwith initial arrest rhythmof pulseless electrical activity: do rhythm characteristics correlate with outcome? American Journal of Emergency Medicine. 33, 891-894.
  8. Holzer M, Bernard SA, Hachimi-Idrissi S, Roine SO, Sterz F, Mullner M. Hypothermia for neuroprotection after cardiac arrest: systematic review and individual patient data meta-analysis. Crit Care Med. 2005;33(2):414–8.
  9. Lundbye JB, Rai M, Ramu B, Hosseini-Khalili A, Li D, Slim H, et al. Therapeutic hypothermia is associated with improved neurologic outcome and survival in cardiac arrest survivors of non-shockable rhythms. Resuscitation. 2012;83(2):202–7.
  10. McNally B, Robb R, Mehta M, Vellano K, Valderamma AL, Yoon PW, et al. Out-of-hospital cardiac arrest surveillance—Cardiac Arrest Registry to Enhance Survival (CARES), United States, October 1, 2005–December 31, 2010. MMWR Surveill Summ. 2011;60(8):1–19
  11. Mehta C, Brady W. Pulseless electrical activity in cardiac arrest: electrocardiographic presentations and management considerations based on the electrocardiogram. American Journal of Emergency Medicine. 2012; 30, 236-239.
  12. Navarro S. Advanced cardiovascular life support provider manual. American Heart Association; 2011.
  13. Niemann JT, Stratton SJ, Cruz B, Lewis RJ. Outcome of out-of hospital post countershock asystole and pulseless electrical activity versus primary asystole and pulseless electrical activity. Crit Care Med. 2001;29:2366-70.
  14. Paradis NA, Martin GB, Goetting MG, et al. Aortic pressure during human cardiac arrest. Identification of pseudo-electromechanical dissociation. Chest 1992;101:123-8.
  15. Parish DC, Dane DC, Montgomery M, et al. Resuscitation in the hospital: relationship of year and rhythm to outcome. Resuscitation. 2000;47:219-29
  16. Skjeflo GW, Nordseth T, Loennechen JP, Bergum D,  Skogvoll E. ECG changes during resuscitation of patients with initial pulseless electrical activity are associated with return of spontaneous circulation. Resuscitation. 2018; 127, 31-36.
  17. Stueven HA, Aufderheide T, Waite EM, Mateer JR. Electromechanical dissociation: six years prehospital experience. Resuscitation. 1989;17: 173-82.
  18. Testori C, Sterz F, Behringer W, Haugk M, Uray T, Zeiner A, et al.Mild therapeutic hypothermia is associated with favourable outcome in patients after cardiac arrest with non-shockable rhythms. Resuscitation. 2011;82(9):1162–7.
  19. Thomas AJ, Newgard CD, Fu R, Zive DM, Daya MR. Survival in out-of-hospital cardiac arrests with initial asystole of pulseless electrical activity and subsequent shockable rhythms. Resuscitation. 2013;84(9):1261–6.
  20. Van Walraven C, Forster AJ, Stiell IG. Derivation of a clinical decision rule for the discontinuation of in-hospital cardiac arrest resuscitations. Arch Intern Med. 1999 Jan 25;159(2):129-34.
  21. Virkkunen I, Paasio L, Ryynanen S, et al. Pulseless electrical activity and unsuccessful out-of-hospital resuscitation: what is the cause of death? Resuscitation. 2008;77:207-10